Featured Content
Recent Content
Event Policies: Multiple Matching Policies Tie-Breaking
I'm looking for information on internal tie-breaking logic when multiple event policies match the same event and have the same weight. From what I have read, this logic is typically based on policy ID or creation order - but which way ? oldest wins OR newest wins ? My team have a set up meant to handle VMware events (API) differently based on the Organization. However they are doing this using device groups in the suppression tab which isn't effective if the event match is the same.Nexus Community Holidays Staffing Hours
Hello Nexus Community Members, We wanted to take a minute to thank you for a great year, all of the great ideas, participation and engagement has been invaluable. As we move into the last two weeks of the year please be aware that many of our staff have various time off scheduled. This may cause some delays in response time- especially with the Ideas Hub. Our Support Portal will continue to be available for existing customers. I will be online as well. Please feel free to message me directly for any issues or concerns pertaining to the community. For other issues please contact your Account Executive, Customer Success Manager or open a support ticket. Cheers, Sara Leslie
Doubt and questions about Global Manager
Hi to all, we configured a Global Manager in our QA env for 2 stacks but there is something that it's not really clear to me. The global manager is not capable to manage PP on the stacks (in AP2 UI there is any menu entry for PP), is not capable to retrieve device groups defined on the stacks, is not capable to retrieve device class from the stack, is not possible create device groups and add devices monitored by the stacks. My first question is: how can we create a dashboard that can filter panels based on custom device group?
Update Device State Signal 15
The process Process 'Update Device State' has a default frequency of 1 min, but we have a large number of device groups, over a thousand, i see this every minute 'already running, not starting, proc name Update Device State' And after a few minutes it then sends a signal 15, and terminals the process 'Process Update Device State has caught signal 15 and is exiting.' I'm wondering whats the implications if i change the time factor to allow the process to run longer, or if there is an limitation to the number of device groups that should be allowed?We’re hosting a live AMA on r/sysadmin about the future of IT operations, join us!
Hi everyone — tomorrow we’re opening up a two-hour AMA focused on real-world IT operations: the challenges you’re facing today, the shifts coming with automation and AI, and what modern observability looks like as environments keep getting more complex. We’d love for you to join us at noon, Eastern, Thursday, Dec 4 here: https://www.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/1pd8den/we_work_on_observability_and_automation_at/ You’re the experts running ScienceLogic in the wild and we’d love to hear your voice as part of the conversation. It will be interesting to hear from the broader sysadmin community which includes more than two million subreddit members. We expect to see the full range of ops experience levels, complexity and scale, large streamlined monitoring teams, and admin armies of one. Swing by and say hello, we look forward to seeing you there. And of course, Jared and I took AMA selfies.
vSphere PowerPack v309
Regarding latest release vSphere PowerPack v309 vSphere version 6.7.0 is supporting and working fine with the current running Vcenter base pack version v308, But the latest Vcenter base pack version 309 will not support vSphere version 6.7.0. (below 7) Hence with this how how we can proceed with upgrade to v309. Please suggest.ScienceLogic Team observing US Holiday Thanksgiving- Nov 27th & 28th
Hello Nexus Community Members, Just a note that the SL team is observing the US Holiday Thanksgiving today and tomorrow. Our Product Managers & Subject Matter Expert's (SME's) will be back online on Monday. Thank you for all of your great participation, I really enjoy seeing the discussions going on. There is so much great information, best practices and ideas being shared amongst our customers and employees. Best Regards, Sara
