Featured Content
Recent Content
Powerflow DeviceSync custom run
We have this kind of issue. discovered thousands of vmware virtual machines in SL1 only need to sync one customer (few hundred vms) into CMDB. So we want to avoid syncing all those thousands into CMDB In PF it is easy to run custom runs with one organization, but can we, and if then how, set the custom configuration to sync just one or few device classes. Or otherway, to add some device classes to that normal deviceclass configuration11Views1like2CommentsFortiGate Sensor monitoring
Hi All., We have Fortinet: FortiGate Sensors Dynamic app installed and collecting Main Power supply and Redundant power supply details. our devices have only Main power supply connected and RPS is not connected. How to ignore or suppress the RPS events. Any suggestion on Formula editor to avoid RPS events ?Solved36Views0likes3CommentsOrphaned Device Class
Hi All, I have come accross a puzzle managing some custom classes accross multiple SL stacks. With the following scenario... 1. You create a custom device class and add it to a powerpack. 2. You delete the powerpack without removing the class 3. In Device Class Editor, you can see the class had 'Yes' still in the 'Powerpack' Colunm. You can also see the linked (now deleted) PPK GUID in the master.definitions_dev_classes table. Is this correct/ expected behaivour that the class remains linked to the now non-existant powerpack? If so, is there a supported way to "unlink" it so the class can be resused in a diffeent powerpack (without having to recreate it and suffer a new GUID to be used) Many Thanks Colin.Solved32Views0likes3CommentsPowerflow Application Immediate Failure
Hi All, I've Developed a Runbook Action within ScienceLogic, that triggers a Powerflow Application if certain Runbook Automation Policy conditions are met. Upon execution, it sends the following payload: "params": { "configuration": configuration, "event_policy_name": EM7_VALUES['%_event_policy_name'], "event_details": EM7_VALUES, "organization_name": EM7_VALUES['%O'], "system_url": system_url, "queue": queue } These parameters are specified as inputs, and some are derived from the EM7Values. When the Runbook Automation linked to this Action executes against a specific Event Policy raised on a Device, i can see a success message in the "Event Notifications" window, and i can see all inputs and variables are passed through in its entirety. The real issue comes when you open Powerflow. The Application immediately fails, giving no error and no explanation as to why it fails. I've been doing testing with the payloads, ensuring that the configuration being referenced exists, and confirmed all these are in place and are working fine. I then removed the "queue" value from the params body, and only passed the rest of the parameters, this succeeds and the application executes without incident. What's interesting, even if manually executing the application in the UI with a custom parameter set, as soon as you specify the queue, it fails. Now its important to know that we've only recently created the queues on a development system, and this is the first time we're testing with the newly created queues. I was hoping that someone in this community might be able to shed some light as to why this might be happening? Could it be that the queues are unreachable, and therefor when not specifying the custom queue, it defaults to the celery or 'priority.high' queue, which are reachable, and therefor works? If the queues are the problem, what could be done to try and fix the problem? Any and all contributions are welcome. Sincerely Andre50Views0likes1CommentAPM Monitoring for ScienceLogic
Hi All, Anyone thought of monitoring the ScienceLogic stacks with full stack observability tools like APPD, Dynatrace etc.? Basically i am interested to see what is happening inside the SL1 appliance like DC ,MC and CDB process level . Whether SL1 supports to install apm agents in the appliance.26Views0likes1CommentAs-built script for ScienceLogic configuration
Hi, dose anyone know of a script that you run, to detail your ScienceLogic application's configuration, so that you can write a ScienceLogic "as-built" application document? Not interested in the underlying servers for this particular ask, as my use case is a ScienceLogic SaaS instance. Thanks! Anne56Views2likes4CommentsUnderstanding DA caching in a CUG
We have a situation where a single DA aligned with a root device caches data about component devices which it then uses to populate metrics for both the root and component devices. Does anyone have some more detail on what happens - at a CUG level - if the collector aligned to the root device becomes unavailable? How does another collector in the CUG know that it needs to start caching data (is that via config push?) and does the whole DCM tree need to be rebuilt but aligned with a different collector? Equally - is there any smarter way to avoid the "Device failed availability" event for the child devices which is only occurring because the cached data from the root device is not available (and not because the child devices really have an availability problem)>36Views1like2Comments🌟 Nexus Member Top Contributors – March 2025 🌟
Honoring the Champions of Our Community March was a month full of vibrant conversations, insightful contributions, and outstanding support within the Nexus Community. We're thrilled to spotlight the members whose voices made the biggest impact! 🙌 Thank You to Our March Top Contributors To everyone who jumped in to answer questions, offered thoughtful feedback, or simply shared their expertise — we see you, and we appreciate you. Your generosity and collaboration are what fuel the heart of this community. 💡 Why Your Contributions Make a Difference Every comment, suggestion, and solution you post creates a ripple effect. You’re helping others troubleshoot, discover new possibilities, and make the most of their experience with us. Your dedication continues to elevate the community for everyone involved. 👏 Shoutout to These Standout Contributors Here are the members who truly went above and beyond in March: Most Page Views teppotahkapaa tied with Mani Most Replies jamesramsden closely followed by Colin, TexPaul & Santeri Most Idea Votes Given teppotahkapaa followed by SamualVick & Mani Most Idea Votes Received bmcsween followed by Mani 🚀 Let’s Keep the Momentum Going! 🚀 We encourage everyone to stay active, share insights, and continue making this space a go-to resource. If you’re new here, don’t hesitate to jump in—your voice matters! Once again, thank you for making March such a fantastic month. We can’t wait to see what we accomplish together in April! Best Regards, The Nexus Community Team
About Discussion Forums
A place for dialogue and discovery about our products and services
200Created: 2 years agoLatest Activity: 23 hours ago