Cisco Unified Communications Manager 14 EOL and 15 Upgrade tips slides from Cisco Live
Hello all! I'm sure some of you are at Cisco Live NAM right now, but if you aren't, there was a great presentation on CUCM. CentOS is being swapped out, CUCM 15 appears to be switching to Python 3, along with other security changes. They've announced an EOL date for CUCM 14 as well. Take a look at the slide deck as it's very interesting. Their product team also informed me that the API is unchanged from v12.5 through CUCM 15, so our integration should continue to work. Please let us know if you have any issues with the latest version of our PowerPack and CUCM 15.Solved1.5KViews2likes1Comment
Version information for PowerPacks
Is it possible to share a complete overview for all the available Powerpacks in the group PowerPack Release Notifications? For instance weekly an update with the new releases (current way of working) and once in the month or bi-monthly an aggregated overview. With one complete overview it becomes easier to compare all your stacks with the lasted released powerpack and implement where needed.Solved155Views1like6Comments
SharePoint 2013 Monitoring
Hi, We have SharePoint 2013 installed and would like to monitor the application. Is there a powerpack for SharePoint 2013 or other ways to monitor SharePoint 2013? I looked at the one available to download. The manual show it only supports 2010. NOTE: The Dynamic Applications in this PowerPack support SharePoint Server 2010 SE. ThanksSolved131Views1like4Comments
Azure monitoring and integration with CMDB
When gathering information from cloud stuff, or actually doing whatever with cloud staff you most often need the object's ID, that long hexastring. That same ID is also most used identifier and required information when trying to sync those cloud "devices" into ServiceNow CMDB. The issue is that SL1 Azure PP does not gather that information too much, one device class that we have so far found it is those actual VMs in cloud. But one could say that those are the only "devices" where it is easily found. So my question is, how you have planned, or done, the CMDB integration of Azure cloud stuff. Or have you done any automation from SL1 to Azure, because also there one always(?) need that object ID. I could have written also an Idea for this, but at least for me, Nexus does not support my ideas.Solved129Views1like2Comments
Unused Powerpacks in Environment
Hi All, I would like to know how customers are managing the unused powerpacks in their environments , because the recommendation is to delete the unused powerpacks because it will create some load during nightly discovery process . In case if we delete those packs also after upgrade it re-appears into stacks. There is any plans to avoid this?Solved122Views0likes2Commentssilo_apps Library for Python 3
Starting the process over converting our Python2 PowerPacks to Python3. I created a Python3 Execution Environment, but there was not a ScienceLogic Silo library for python3 to add. Does this need to be download from SL and imported? Or do I use Py2 Library? Without this library in my Dynamic Application it wont be able to interact with SL1.Solved117Views1like2CommentsCloud-delivered FMC
Hi All, We're seeing a bit of an uptick in customers moving to the cloud-delivered firewall management center from Cisco as opposed to traditional virtual FMCs. This seems to be a trend with Cisco alongside things like Intersight becoming more prevalent, which the powerpack has already been developed for. Is there any current intention (or possibly something I missed) to monitor Cisco Firewalls through cloud FMC? Admittedly I haven't done much research yet into possible open API capabilities for this.Solved97Views1like3CommentsSL1: System Upgrade Assessment v100 PowerPack Release Notification
We are pleased to announce that the SL1: System Upgrade Assessment v100 PowerPack has been released. The download for this release can be found on the Support Portal under the PowerPack filename: https://support.sciencelogic.com/s/release-version/aBuVL0000000Uu90AE/sl1-system-upgrade-assessment The following enhancements and addressed issues are included this release of the SL1: System Upgrade Assessment v100 PowerPack: The System Upgrade Assessment PowerPack version 100 includes the following features: - A "Python Assessment Tool" report tool that identifies which PowerPacks will need to be rebuilt before upgrading to a newer SL1 version. - A "PowerPack Encryption Validation" report tool that identifies which PowerPacks need to be rebuilt before upgrading SL1 to version 12.2.2 or above. Please refer to the SL1: System Upgrade Assessment v100 PowerPack File Details in the PowerPacks section of the Support Portal for all information pertaining to the SL1: System Upgrade Assessment v100 PowerPack Support Status, Minimum SL1 Version, Solution Information, and Pricing Information. The SL1: System Upgrade Assessment v100 PowerPack Release File Details also contains links to the Release Notes, Manual, and PowerPack Info Report. Issues Addressed in the SL1: System Upgrade Assessment v100 PowerPack Release can be found in the Release Notes.Solved91Views1like3Comments
Snippet possible bug w/ mac address encoding
Has anyone run into an issue where a few MAC addresses are being read by the snmp handler `snmp_walk` method as gibberish? Non-MAC address string data is returned on some interfaces that seems to be some form of unicode. This is an example when running the SNMP walk from bash: IP-MIB::ipNetToMediaPhysAddress.2.10.250.123.5 = STRING: 24:2a:4:f0:7a:c7 This is the same OID when read by the python SNMP handler: ('.1.3.6.1.2.1.4.22.1.2.2.10.250.123.5', '$*\x04ðzÇ') I've tested the python2.7 execution environment, and the 3.6 env from the Cisco base pack 214. Thanks! JoeSolved53Views1like2Comments
